VM-PRO External Evaluation - Partners Consultation (Final)

Consent: *

YesNo
I provide my explicit consent for my participation in the aforementioned external evaluation survey and for the subsequent processing of the data and information I provide, as above described:

1. Project objectives and work-plan (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
We did not have issues with understanding and implementing the project action plan
We did not face issues with the timely delivery of our assigned activities/tasks.
We delivered our assigned activities/tasks at the expected quality.
Please, share any comment you consider useful to support your responses:

2. Partnership communication (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
The communication among project partners has been easy and fruitful.
The communication and collaboration at project transnational meetings or other bilateral meetings has been effective.
The interaction with partners in the production of joint tasks/outputs has been successful.
The use of the online tools for data storage and exchange of information has been effective.
Please, share any comments you consider useful, to support your responses:

3. Activity and financial coordination (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
The communication with the coordinating team has been easy and effective
The communication and collaboration with other activity leaders have been effective
We received all required support regarding the work-plan analysis and definition of expectations
We received all required support regarding financial issues and reporting.
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

4. Understanding of outputs and contributions (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
We are fully aware about the produced project outputs
We are clear about what our contribution was/should-be to each one of the outputs
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

5. Innovation confirmed by partners, stakeholders and the literature (please, rate the innovation level of each project output below): *

LowMediumHighVery high
Output 1: Good practice guide in youth mentoring to prevent educational and labour market dropouts
Output 2: Extended code of practice for conducting youth mentoring program
Output 3: Self-assessment system for external validation as a part of a blended-assessment model
Output 4: Android based mobile mentoring application to facilitate distance mentoring for youth with disabilities
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

6. Effectiveness confirmed by partners and stakeholders (please, rate the effectiveness level of each project output below): *

LowMediumHighVery high
Output 1: Good practice guide in youth mentoring to prevent educational and labour market dropouts
Output 2: Extended code of practice for conducting youth mentoring program
Output 3: Self-assessment system for external validation as a part of a blended-assessment model
Output 4: Android based mobile mentoring application to facilitate distance mentoring for youth with disabilities
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

7. Usability confirmed by partners and stakeholders (please, rate the usability level of each project output below): *

LowMediumHighVery high
Output 1: Good practice guide in youth mentoring to prevent educational and labour market dropouts
Output 2: Extended code of practice for conducting youth mentoring program
Output 3: Self-assessment system for external validation as a part of a blended-assessment model
Output 4: Android based mobile mentoring application to facilitate distance mentoring for youth with disabilities
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

8. Accessibility confirmed by partners and stakeholders (please, rate the accessibility level of each project output below): *

LowMediumHighVery high
Output 1: Good practice guide in youth mentoring to prevent educational and labour market dropouts
Output 2: Extended code of practice for conducting youth mentoring program
Output 3: Self-assessment system for external validation as a part of a blended-assessment model
Output 4: Android based mobile mentoring application to facilitate distance mentoring for youth with disabilities
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

9. Dissemination (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
We are aware of the dissemination tools created in the project
We have contributed to the creation of the dissemination tools
We have used certain dissemination tools effectively
We undertook dissemination activities according to the plan
We managed to disseminate project outputs successfully to users and stakeholders in our local community
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

10. Sustainability and Impact (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
Users/stakeholders in our country are fully aware of the project outputs
Users/stakeholders in our country understand how to use the outputs in their business
Users/stakeholders in our country confirm their motivation to use the outputs
Users see an added value to their work by using the outputs
Users/stakeholders have already committed in using certain part of the project outputs
We already have a clear plan on how to exploit and sustain our contributions
We already have a clear plan on how to continue collaboration with other partners to exploit the products as a whole
The investment was worth it and we expect to break even within planned time-frame.
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

11. Organisation name: *

12. Names of persons that will attend a face-to-face interview at Florence transnational meeting: *

13. Contact details (email/phone) of persons in previous answer: *

14. Please, give any additional comments and feedback to the External Evaluator, as you deem necessary: