Information

The questionnaire is shared as part of the VET4SBO project Quality Assurance and Internal Evaluation activities. Its purpose is the: i) Evaluation of the transnational meeting against KPIs in the strategy; ii) Identification of possible risk factors and recommendations for improvements in the execution of the project meetings; iii) Feeding of data into the evaluation reports to be submitted to the project consortium.

Participation is mandatory for all people that attended the meeting. Your responses are confidential and will only be used for the purposes of the meeting evaluation. You will be informed of the results of this survey through a dedicated presentation at one of the subsequent project transnational meetings.

For your participation in this survey you will be asked to give some data and information, which will be processed in accordance with the general Data Management and Protection Policy you can find here. Please, pay particular attention to your rights in relation with your personal data. Acting in the framework of our general policy, we provide the following specific information with regards to the collection and processing of data for the present study:

Please, note: the above-mentioned data will be kept ONLY during and within the VET4SBO project contract. After the end of the contract and a subsequent period of 6 months, all data that link your responses to your identity, will be deleted and the questionnaire content will undergo a fully anonymized processing. In other words, no human or the system collecting data, will be able to identify the individual that provided the responses. The pseudonymized data will be kept for a period of 5 years for the needs of the project and the funding agency.

By continuing to the questionnaire, you agree that you provide your explicit consent for your participation in the meeting evaluation and for the subsequent processing of the data and information you provide, as above described.

	1	2	3	4	5
Were the topics of the meeting clear?
Were decisions or actions taken clear?
Were the meetings' objectives reasonable, given available time and resources?
Were the priorities of the meeting clear?

	1	2	3	4	5
Was the agenda made clear by the meeting organizer before the meeting?
Were participants informed of the meeting sufficient time in advance to allow adequate preparation?
Were all necessary materials distributed sufficient time in advance to allow review?
Was the time schedule of the meeting convenient?

	1	2	3	4	5
Was sufficient time allocated to each item on the agenda?
Were all people given an opportunity and encouraged to participate?
Was there a good team/group spirit?
Were people presenting information well prepared and organized?
Did the group adhere to the agenda?

	1	2	3	4	5
Instilling a sense of common purpose?
Keeping the group on track?
Creating an atmosphere that supported the free exchange of ideas and information?
Providing positive feedback when required?
Maintaining interest and enthusiasm?
Summarizing periodically and/or at the end of the meeting?
Moving the group towards closure on agenda items?
Concluding the meeting close to the scheduled ending time?

	1	2	3	4	5
Catering
Directions & maps
Meeting room
Refreshments
Venue

VET4SBO Project meeting evaluation - TSN2

Information

1. Personal Information

Name: *

Organization name: *

2. Meeting Goals and Objectives

Meeting goals and objectives (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied) *

3. Notification

Notification (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied) *

4. Participation

Meeting organization (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied) *

5. Leader

Was the meeting leader effective in: (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied) *

6. Meeting follow-up

Meeting follow-up (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied) *

7. Accommodation and Catering

Accommodation and catering (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied) *

8. Opinion on the meeting

What do you consider to be the main strength of this meeting? *

Were there any weak points? *

Can you see any problem areas for the project that should be tackled as soon as possible? If so, please suggest some measures or ways of solving the problem(s). *

What is your spontaneous feeling about the project after this meeting? *

	1	2	3	4	5
At the closing of the meeting, was there consensus on decisions or actions?
Were follow-up assignments and responsibilities clear?