Pathway+ External Evaluation - Partners Consultation (Survey)
Pathway+ External Evaluation – Information and Consent
Please, read the following data management and protection policy and provide your explicit consent before moving to the survey content:
Thank you for choosing to allocate your time to participate in this External Evaluation survey, which is undertaken in the framework of the Pathway+ project and in the interest of the project's partnership.
The purpose of the survey is the: i) Evaluation of project outputs against information in project’s contract and any documents produced and agreed by the consortium thereafter; ii) Evaluation of the dissemination/impact of the project outputs against KPIs in the project’s contract and any relevant information produced and agreed upon by the consortium thereafter; iii) Identification of possible risk factors and recommendations for improvements in the execution of the project; iv) Production of the Interim external evaluation report to be submitted to the project consortium.
Participation is mandatory for at least one person per partner organisation. Your responses are confidential and will only be used for the purposes of the survey. You will be informed of the results of this survey through a dedicated presentation at one of the subsequent project transnational meetings.
For your participation in this survey you will be asked to give some data and information, which will be processed in accordance with the general Data Management and Protection Policy you can find here. Please, pay particular attention to your rights in relation with your personal data. Acting in the framework of our general policy, we provide the following specific information with regards to the collection and processing of data for the present study:
Please, note: the above-mentioned data will be kept ONLY during and within the Pathway+ project contract. After the end of the contract and a subsequent period of 6 months, all data that link your responses to your identity, will be deleted and the questionnaire content will undergo a fully anonymized processing. In other words, no human or the system collecting data, will be able to identify the individual that provided the responses. Your email or other contact details will be kept longer only if you give your explicit consent. The pseudonymized data will be kept for a period of 5 years for the needs of the project and the funding agency.
Consent: *
| Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|
| I provide my explicit consent for my participation in the aforementioned external evaluation survey and for the subsequent processing of the data and information I provide, as above described: | ||
| I also explicitly consent for you to keep my email and the other contact details I provide with this survey, so that you will be able to follow up with me regarding the Pathway+ External Evaluation activities: | ||
| I also explicitly consent for you to keep my email and the other contact details I provide with this survey, so that you will be able to contact me and inform me of other projects you participate in, which are relevant to my line of business and profile: |
Part I - Project Internal Process
1. Project objectives and work-plan (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We are aware of the project workplan and timeplan and all specific activities/tasks. | ||||
| We are aware of the activities/tasks under our organisation's responsibility. | ||||
| We are aware of the currently active action plan, as agreed in transnational meetings. | ||||
| We did not face issues with the timely delivery of our assigned activities/tasks. | ||||
| We delivered our assigned activities/tasks at the expected quality. |
2. Partnership communication (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The communication among project partners has been easy and fruitful. | ||||
| The communication and collaboration at project transnational meetings or other bilateral meetings has been effective. | ||||
| The interaction with partners in the production of joint tasks/outputs has been successful. | ||||
| The use of the online tools for data storage and exchange of information has been effective. |
3. Activity and financial coordination (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The communication with the coordinating team has been easy and effective | ||||
| The communication and collaboration with other activity leaders have been effective | ||||
| We received all required support regarding the work-plan analysis and definition of expectations | ||||
| We received all required support regarding financial issues and reporting. |
Part II - Project Intellectual Outputs
4. Partners understanding of outputs and contributions (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We are fully aware about what the project outputs are | ||||
| We are clear about what our contribution was to each one of the outputs |
5. Innovation (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We are convinced of the innovation of project outputs | ||||
| The innovation of project outputs is confirmed by our local stakeholders | ||||
| The innovation of project outputs can be confirmed by existing literature/industrial state-of-the-art |
6. Effectiveness, Usability, Accessibility (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most project outputs will be effective when applied by users/stakeholders | ||||
| Most project outputs present a sufficient degree of accessibility | ||||
| Most project outputs present a sufficient degree of usability |
7. Dissemination (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We are aware of the dissemination tools created in the project | ||||
| We have contributed to the creation of the dissemination tools | ||||
| We are using certain dissemination tools effectively | ||||
| We undertake dissemination activities according to the plan | ||||
| We managed to disseminate project outputs successfully to users and stakeholders in our local community |
Part III - Outputs Sustainability and Impact
8. Sustainability and Impact (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *
| Not at all | Not really | Agree | Absolutely agree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We have identified the users/stakeholders related to each output in our country | ||||
| We communicated with users/stakeholders and informed them about the (expected) outputs | ||||
| Users/stakeholders in our country are fully aware of the project outputs | ||||
| Users/stakeholders in our country understand how to use the outputs in their business | ||||
| Users/stakeholders in our country confirm their motivation to use the outputs | ||||
| Users see an added value to their work by using the outputs | ||||
| Users/stakeholders have already committed in using certain part of the project outputs | ||||
| We already have a clear plan on how to exploit and sustain our contributions | ||||
| We already have a clear plan on how to continue collaboration with other partners to exploit the products as a whole | ||||
| The investment was worth it and we expect to break even within planned time-frame. |