Pathway+ External Evaluation - Partners Consultation (Final Survey)

Consent: *

YesNo
I provide my explicit consent for my participation in the aforementioned external evaluation survey and for the subsequent processing of the data and information I provide, as above described:

I.1. Project objectives and work-plan (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
The project run smoothly with respect to the project workplan and timeplan and all specific activities/tasks.
Our work on the activities/tasks under our organisation's responsibility have been progressed according to the action plan.
We did not face any challenges with regard to the currently active action plan, as agreed in latest virtual meetings.
We did not face issues with the timely delivery of our assigned activities/tasks.
We delivered our assigned activities/tasks at the expected quality.
Please, share any comment you consider useful to support your responses:

I.2. Partnership communication (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
The communication among project partners has been easy and fruitful.
The communication and collaboration at physical and virtual meetings has been effective.
The interaction with partners in the production of joint tasks/outputs has been successful.
The use of the online tools for data storage and exchange of information has been effective.
The use of teleconferencing facilities has been easy and effective.
Our productivity through the virtual meetings remained unaffected or in some cases it had been improved.
Please, share any comments you consider useful, to support your responses:

I.3. Activity and financial coordination (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
The communication with the coordinating team has been easy and effective
The communication and collaboration with other activity leaders have been effective
We received all required support regarding the work-plan analysis and definition of expectations
We received all required support regarding financial issues and reporting.
We did not face reporting issues related to the pandemic.
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

II.1. Partners understanding of outputs and contributions (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
We are fully aware about what the project outputs are
We are clear about what our contribution has been to each one of the outputs
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

II.2. Completeness (Please, indicate the level of completeness for each project output) *

LowMediumHighNot applicable
IO1: Descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO2: 5 mobile games to support effective pedagogical approaches selection
IO3: Mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO4: Handbook for teacher educators on usage descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO5: Manual for teachers on using the mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO6: Impact and best practices report
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.

II.3. Quality (Please, indicate the level of quality for each project output) *

LowMediumHighNot applicable
IO1: Descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO2: 5 mobile games to support effective pedagogical approaches selection
IO3: Mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO4: Handbook for teacher educators on usage descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO5: Manual for teachers on using the mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO6: Impact and best practices report
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.

II.4. Innovation (Please, indicate the level of innovation for each project output) *

LowMediumHighNot applicable
IO1: Descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO2: 5 mobile games to support effective pedagogical approaches selection
IO3: Mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO4: Handbook for teacher educators on usage descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO5: Manual for teachers on using the mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO6: Impact and best practices report
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.

II.5. Effectiveness (Please, indicate the level of effectiveness for each project output) *

LowMediumHighNot applicable
IO1: Descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO2: 5 mobile games to support effective pedagogical approaches selection
IO3: Mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO4: Handbook for teacher educators on usage descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO5: Manual for teachers on using the mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO6: Impact and best practices report
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.

II.6. Usability (Please, indicate the level of usability for each project output) *

LowMediumHighNot applicable
IO1: Descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO2: 5 mobile games to support effective pedagogical approaches selection
IO3: Mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO4: Handbook for teacher educators on usage descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO5: Manual for teachers on using the mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO6: Impact and best practices report
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.

II.7. Accessibility (Please, indicate the level of accessibility for each project output) *

LowMediumHighNot applicable
IO1: Descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO2: 5 mobile games to support effective pedagogical approaches selection
IO3: Mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO4: Handbook for teacher educators on usage descriptive map of effective pedagogical approaches
IO5: Manual for teachers on using the mobile pedagogical attention/engagement measurement App
IO6: Impact and best practices report
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.

II.8. Dissemination (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
We are aware of the dissemination tools created in the project
We have contributed to the creation of the dissemination tools
We have been using certain dissemination tools effectively
We undertook dissemination activities according to the plan
We managed to disseminate project outputs successfully to users and stakeholders in our local community
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

III.1. Sustainability and Impact (please, indicate the extent to which you agree with the statements below): *

Not at allNot reallyAgreeAbsolutely agree
We have identified the users/stakeholders related to each output in our country
We communicated with users/stakeholders and informed them about the (expected) outputs
Users/stakeholders in our country are fully aware of the project outputs
Users/stakeholders in our country understand how to use the outputs in their business
Users/stakeholders in our country confirm their motivation to use the outputs
Users see an added value to their work by using the outputs
Users/stakeholders have already committed in using certain part of the project outputs
We already have a clear plan on how to exploit and sustain our contributions
We already have a clear plan on how to continue collaboration with other partners to exploit the products as a whole
The investment was worth it and we expect to break even within planned time-frame.
Please, share any comment you consider useful, to support your responses:

Organisation name: *

Names and emails of persons that will attend an online interview when required: *

Please, give any additional comments and feedback to the External Evaluator, as you deem necessary: